Jean-Philippe Mateta has informed Crystal Palace that he wants to leave the club in the current transfer window, a development that has alerted suitors Aston Villa and Juventus and thrown fresh uncertainty over Palace’s attacking plans for the rest of the season.
The France international striker, under contract at Selhurst Park until the summer of 2027, has become one of Palace’s most influential players in recent campaigns. His 48 goals in 149 appearances have underpinned the club’s progress domestically and in Europe, and his desire to move on is understood to have come as a significant blow to the hierarchy.
Sources close to the situation indicate that Mateta has not submitted a formal transfer request but has made his intentions clear in discussions with senior figures at the club. He is believed to be keen on testing himself at a higher level, particularly with the prospect of Champions League football and a more prominent role in the France national team on his mind.
Despite the player’s stance, Crystal Palace are not actively looking to sell. The club’s position remains that Mateta will only be allowed to leave if a substantial offer arrives, one that reflects both his importance to the team and the difficulty of replacing a proven Premier League goalscorer mid-season. For now, an exit is described as “not close,” with Palace prepared to hold firm unless their valuation is met.
The timing of Mateta’s declaration is especially sensitive. Palace are attempting to strengthen their squad rather than dismantle it, with ambitions of pushing up the Premier League table and mounting a serious challenge in the UEFA Europa Conference League. The club’s recent success, including FA Cup and Community Shield victories at Wembley in 2025, has raised expectations among supporters and within the dressing room.
However, this window has already brought upheaval. Captain Marc Guehi has been sold to Manchester City in a deal worth around £20 million, removing a key defensive leader from Oliver Glasner’s side. Glasner himself has confirmed he will leave at the end of the season when his contract expires, adding another layer of uncertainty to the club’s medium-term planning.
Against that backdrop, losing Mateta now would risk undermining the momentum Palace have tried to build. The club’s recruitment team has been working on potential attacking reinforcements, but replacing a forward who has delivered consistently in the Premier League and in high-pressure cup fixtures is far from straightforward.
Mateta’s form over the past two seasons has transformed his status from squad option to central figure. Initially arriving in England with questions over his consistency, he has developed into a reliable focal point in attack, combining physical presence with improved movement and finishing. His goals were instrumental in Palace’s cup run that culminated in silverware at Wembley, moments that have cemented his popularity among fans.
That rise in profile has not gone unnoticed elsewhere. Aston Villa, who have been steadily building a squad capable of competing on multiple fronts, are monitoring Mateta closely. Villa are already working on a deal to bring Tammy Abraham back to the club, with the striker currently on loan at Besiktas from Roma, but Mateta is viewed as an alternative or even a complementary option depending on how negotiations develop.
Villa’s interest is driven by a desire to deepen their attacking options and add a forward with Premier League experience who can adapt quickly to their system. Mateta’s ability to occupy defenders, link play and contribute in big matches makes him an attractive target for a side looking to consolidate its place among the league’s European contenders.
On the continent, Juventus are also in the frame. The Italian giants have been reshaping their squad and see Mateta as a potential solution to their need for a powerful central striker. While they have not abandoned the idea of signing him, they are simultaneously exploring a move for Fenerbahce forward Youssef En Nesyri as an alternative. That dual-track approach underlines both their interest and the financial and strategic calculations involved in any major attacking signing.
For Mateta, the appeal of a move to a club regularly competing in the Champions League is obvious. The 28-year-old has broken into the France national team, earning three caps and scoring twice since his first call-up. With a World Cup on the horizon, he is determined to remain in the thoughts of the national selectors, and a high-profile transfer could strengthen his case.
Those close to the player suggest that his decision is not rooted in dissatisfaction with Crystal Palace but in a belief that this may be the right moment to take the next step in his career. At 28, he is entering what many consider a striker’s peak years, and the combination of international ambitions and interest from major clubs has sharpened his focus on his long-term trajectory.
Palace, though, can point to their own ambitions. The club has invested in a squad designed to compete, not merely survive, and the recent taste of silverware has raised internal expectations. Allowing one of their most important players to leave mid-season would run counter to that narrative unless the fee received could be immediately reinvested in a replacement of similar calibre.
There is also the question of dressing-room dynamics. Glasner has relied heavily on Mateta’s presence up front, and any departure would force a tactical rethink. While Palace do have other attacking options, none offer quite the same blend of physicality, experience and recent productivity. The manager, already planning for his own exit in the summer, must now navigate the challenge of keeping Mateta focused and committed while uncertainty over his future lingers.
For now, all parties are engaged in a delicate balancing act. Mateta has made his wishes known but remains a Crystal Palace player, expected to train and play as normal while the window remains open. Palace are listening to interest but are under no financial pressure to sell and will demand a fee that reflects his status. Villa and Juventus, meanwhile, must decide how far they are prepared to go, both in terms of transfer fee and wages, to secure a striker whose value has rarely been higher.
As the window progresses, the situation is likely to crystallise. A decisive bid from one of the interested clubs could force Palace into a difficult decision, weighing the immediate impact on their season against the longer-term benefits of a substantial transfer fee. If no such offer arrives, Mateta may be required to park his ambitions, at least temporarily, and lead the line for a club still chasing success on multiple fronts.
What is clear is that Jean-Philippe Mateta has reached a crossroads in his career. Whether he remains the spearhead of Crystal Palace’s attack or moves on to Aston Villa, Juventus or another suitor, the outcome of this saga will shape not only his future but also the direction of a Palace side trying to establish itself among the Premier League’s most ambitious clubs.